Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
Developers & APIs · G

GraphQL

GraphQL is a query language for APIs and an accompanying runtime with which clients determine precisely which data they request from a server. Rather than calling several fixed endpoints, the client sends a single request to a single endpoint and describes exactly the data structure wanted in it. The server then returns exactly those fields, no more and no less. GraphQL counts as a flexible alternative to REST and is particularly strong where clients have different, nested data needs. At its centre stands a strongly typed schema describing all available data and operations and so serving at once as a contract and as documentation. Over-fetching and under-fetching can thus be avoided, that is, transferring too much data or laboriously loading missing data across several requests.

Also known as: Graph Query Language, GraphQL API

What is GraphQL?

GraphQL was developed to address typical weaknesses of classic REST interfaces. At its centre is a strongly typed schema describing every available data type, field and relationship. That schema is the contract between client and server and serves as documentation at the same time.

A GraphQL request is declarative: the client writes a query resembling the response structure it wants, and the server fills it with data. There are essentially three operation types: query for reading, mutation for changing and subscription for real-time updates over persistent connections.

Because there is typically only one endpoint, the logic of selecting data shifts from server to client, which Interface makes considerably more flexible.

GraphQL versus REST

The biggest difference lies in selecting data. With REST, every endpoint returns a fixed structure, which often leads to over-fetching (too much data) or under-fetching (too little, needing several requests). GraphQL avoids both, because the client requests exactly the fields needed and brings nested data together in a single request.

REST, by contrast, scores with simplicity, established HTTP caching and broad tool support. Since GraphQL usually uses only one endpoint, classic HTTP caching is harder and needs its own strategies on the client or server side.

The choice depends on the use case: GraphQL shines with complex, variant-rich data needs, while REST often remains the more pragmatic solution for simple, clearly delimited resources. Many organisations use both approaches in parallel and decide per interface which style best fits the data flow and the clients involved.

Benefits and challenges

Among its strengths are precise control over data, fewer requests and strong typing, which enables tooling for autocompletion, validation and documentation. Front-end teams can often meet new data needs without back-end changes, as long as the fields exist in the schema.

Set against that are challenges. Complex or deeply nested queries can load the server heavily, so safeguards such as depth limits and complexity analysis are needed. Caching and monitoring are also more demanding than with REST, since requests cannot be distinguished by URL.

One particular trap is the N+1 problem when resolving nested fields, though techniques such as batching defuse it.

GraphQL in modern applications

GraphQL suits applications with many different clients particularly well, such as web and mobile apps each needing different slices of data. Through a shared schema they all use the same endpoint, without separate endpoints having to be maintained for each client.

In professional Software development GraphQL is often laid over several backend services as a single data layer. In combination with AI solutions the typed schema is valuable because it can be read by machines and clearly tells an agent which data and operations are available before it formulates targeted queries.

A widespread architectural pattern is so-called schema stitching or federation, in which several GraphQL services are combined into one shared schema. Teams can thus run their own areas independently while clients still get a single, consistent entry point.

Building a GraphQL API

At the centre is defining the schema in the schema definition language. There, object types with their fields, the entry types query and mutation, and scalar and composite types are described. The schema is the binding contract that server and clients alike follow.

Every field has a so-called resolver on the server side, a function supplying the field's value. Resolvers can draw data from databases, other services or existing REST interfaces. A GraphQL layer can thus be laid over legacy system landscapes without rebuilding them entirely.

Mature client libraries exist that formulate queries type-safely, cache results and optimise loading nested data. That cuts the effort on the front end considerably, and the strong typing prevents many errors at development time already.

Frequently asked questions

What is GraphQL?

GraphQL is a query language and runtime for APIs with which clients request exactly the data they need through a single endpoint. The server returns precisely the fields requested. A strongly typed schema describes all available data and operations.

What is the difference between GraphQL and REST?

With REST, every endpoint returns a fixed data structure, which can lead to over- or under-fetching. With GraphQL the client specifies exactly the fields it wants through a single endpoint. REST is simpler and easier to cache, GraphQL more flexible with complex data needs.

Which operation types does GraphQL have?

There are three operation types: query for reading data, mutation for creating, changing or deleting, and subscription for real-time updates over a persistent connection. GraphQL thus covers read, write and live scenarios through one uniform interface.

When should you use GraphQL instead of REST?

GraphQL pays off when different clients need different, often nested slices of data or when many requests are to be combined. With simple, clearly delimited resources and where strong HTTP caching matters, REST often remains the more pragmatic choice.

What are the drawbacks of GraphQL?

Caching and monitoring take more effort, because requests are not distinguished by URL. Complex queries can load the server and call for depth and complexity limits. The N+1 problem when resolving nested fields also has to be defused, for instance through batching.

What is a resolver in GraphQL?

A resolver is a server-side function that supplies the value of a schema field. Resolvers draw their data from databases, other services or existing REST interfaces. A GraphQL layer can thus be laid over legacy systems without rebuilding them entirely.

Put AI to work for your business?

We help you integrate artificial intelligence into your processes, your marketing and your website — strategically and securely.

Request a project

Stefan

Your contact

Stefan

I look forward to hearing about your project and finding the best solution together.